Date-Based Archives
<<January 2009>>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567
Main Page
 
Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
Recent Posts
Apple Introduces Revolutionary New Laptop With No Keyboard
The Role of the RNC Chair
Obama’s latest jobs plan
Vote for Pundit Review!
Automatic Congressional Pay Raises Explained
RNC Chair Debate - Best in Show
Climate Change: Ebb and Floe
Bill Ayers on Bill Ayers, oh, and education
Hamas has no desire to negotiate "peace"
Podcast for 4 Jan 09
 
Resources
Blogometer
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Capital Integrity
CentCom
CIA Factbook
Daou Report
Economic Freedom Index
Electoral Vote Counter
Finance News
GeographyIQ
Google News
Health Answers
Health Questions and Answers
Legislative Seat Counter
MEMRI
NationMaster
New York Times
Polling Report
Real Clear Politics
Reason Magazine
Tax Facts
TCS Daily
US Military Ribbons
US Military Insignia
US Statistical Abstract
USA Today
Washington Post
Washington Times
White House
 
The Neolibertarian Network

To subscribe to The New Libertarian, click here.

The Neolibertarian Network

If you'd like to submit your blog for membership in the Neolibertarian Network, click here for the submission guidelines. If you would like to submit an article or essay for consideration in The New Libertarian, click here for article submission guidelines.

1492
2 Valuable
Ace of Trump
An American Front Porch
Antivenom
The Art of The Blog
Aggressive-Voice Daily
AlphaPatriot
Area 417
Arktinen Jenkki
American Conservative Daily
The Anti-Jihad Pundit
A Second Hand Conjecture
Atlas Blogged
Atlas Shrugs
autoDogmatic
Baby Troll Blog
Below the Beltway
BitsBlog
Backlog Bob
Dave Budge
Capitalism and Freedom
Christian Libertarian
Church of the Painful Truth
Claudio Tellez
Classical Values
Clowning Glory
Code Blue Blog
Combs Spouts Off
Confederate Yankee
Cold Fury
The Conjecturer
The Cranky Insomniac
Daily Pundit
David M
Damnum Absque Injuria
Dave's Not Here
The Dead hand
Democratic Peace
Dean Esmay
Diminishing Returns
Divided we Stand...
Dodgeblogium
Dog Pundit
Don't Let Me Stop You
The Dumb Ox
Eric's Grumbles Before The Grave
Ethermind
The Everlasting Phelps
Federal Republic
Freedom's Gate
Freedom Watch
Freedom Works
The Freeman's Burden
Free State Blogs
Fresh Politics
From Right 2 Left
Galen's Log
GavPolitics
Gay Orbit
GOP3: The Triumvirate
Hamster Motor
Hydrablog
Impudent Domain
INCITE
Independent Sources
The International Libertarian
The Interocitor
IO Error
Jeff Doolittle
Joe Libertarian
Josh's Weblog
Kapitalismo
Kerfuffles
The Key Monk
Late at Night
Legal Redux
Liberal Cpaitalist
Libertarian Leanings
Liberty 1st
Liberty and Culture
Liberty Cadre
The Liberty Lamp
Liberty Corner
Louisiana Libertarian
Liberty 1st
Medary
Minor Thoughts
The Modern American
MuD and PHuD
Musings, Rants, and Monologues
The Neo-Communist
Neo Warmonger
The New American Revolutionist
Never Yet Melted
New World Man
No Government Cheese
N.O. Pundit
No Speed Bumps
Nothing Could Be Finer
Occam's Carbuncle
Cody O'Connor
Of Punk Rock and Politics
Ogre's Politics and Views
Oil Guru
OK, So I'm Not Really a Cowboy
One Man Bandwidth
The Outside Story
The Owner's Manual
Peace For Our Time
Politicalities
Politics and Pigskins
PolySciFi
Propaganda Machine
Pull Out the Pin
Protein Wisdom
The Quietist
Quotulatiousness
The Q Speaks
The Ranting Kraut
Rife's Torch
The Right Nation
Right On
Right Side of the Rainbow
Right Wing of the Gods
Robinik
Jim Rose
Rossputin
Samson Blinded
Saving Liberty
Seitelplasm
Shaking Spears
Spherical Tones
Rusty Sheridan
The Skeptical Optimist
The Smallest Minority
Squawkbox Noise
Strange Fictions
Stranger in a Strange Land
D.C. Thornton
Tipperography
The Thomas Institute
Unalienable Rights
The Unrepentant Individual
Vox Baby
Wade's World
What Can Brown Do For You?
What's That Smell
White Peril
The Will to Exist
The Wrightwing
The Young Conservatives

 
Blogroll

Categories
Awards
Blogging
Business
Congress
Culture
Economics
Education
Elections
Energy
Environment
Foreign Affairs
Freedom and Liberty
Government
Guns and Gun Rights
Health Care
Humor
Immigration
Iraq
iTunes
Legal Affairs
Libertarian
Media
Military Affairs
Miscellaneous
Neolibertarianism
New Media
News
None
Open Thread
Personal
Philosophy
Photoblogging
Podcasting
Politics
Professional Blogging
Project Hero
QuotObama
Race
Religion
Scandals
Science
Security
Taxation
Technology
Terrorism
The Left
The New Libertarian
The War
Trade
Twilight Zone
Web Development
 
Movable Type Archives
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
 
QandO RSS Feed
Podcast
 
Credits

Powered By

Other Credits:
Blogstreet Blog profile

The TruthLaidBear Blog  Ecosystem

Listed on BlogShares

Idiotvox Podcasting

Add to Technorati Favorites

BlogTalkRadio.com
Check out our live, call-in show Sundays at 5pm Pacific (8pm Eastern)!

 
Monday, January 05, 2009

Apple Introduces Revolutionary New Laptop With No Keyboard
Posted by: Dale Franks
 
Apple does it again, with a revolutionary new ultra-slim notebook.

 

Permalink | Comments ( 1 ) | TrackBacks ( 0 ) | Category: Humor

 
QandO
 
The Role of the RNC Chair
Posted by: Bryan Pick
 
Here's the extended comment I left at The Next Right in response to Mindy Finn's question of the appropriate role(s) of the RNC Chair:

Divider

Private fundraising, both directly from candidates and from third-party (not "Libertarian" third party, but "MoveOn" third-party) groups, should start to take precedence over centralized party funds for individual races.  If a critical race needs to be tipped one way or the other, the Right needs to have a separate infrastructure in place to get funds to that candidate.  The party should highlight these races, but not spend funds fighting fires close to election day.

The Republican Party, under the leadership of the chairman, should start to identify itself primarily as the facilitator of infrastructure, making sure that the Right has all the institutions it needs to:
  • build local membership,
  • recruit candidates as broadly as possible, so we can challenge the Dems everywhere,
  • pressure Democrats steadily on both policy and personnel,
  • identify winnable races,
  • pick up on new shifts in the political winds (memes that can catch on, new winning issues that can attract at least part-time allies into the coalition, and even demographic changes), and
  • develop new policy ideas (we already have formidable institutions in place for this).
The focus here should be on building from the bottom up, and can most efficiently be done by providing the tools rather than sending in late reinforcements for each campaign (money, manpower, etc.).

So in each and every locale, the local infrastructure's job during elections should be to:
  • alert non-local Republicans to unexpected vulnerabilities that can be exploited with wider attention and more resources,
  • score points against Democrat personnel whenever the opportunity arises (start building the rap sheets now in those blue states, because these victories are cumulative and mutually reinforcing),
  • win if possible, but
  • always be shifting the Overton window toward the Right's ideas and policies, staying somewhat to the Right of even the candidates themselves.  (Candidates, in turn, need to learn to tolerate this pressure, and take advantage of the blazed path when the opposition weakens on an issue.)
The top-down part of the chairman's job is secondary but necessary: rather than try to set a policy agenda himself, he should be trying to manage relationships, as you say, so that the factions can tolerate each other long enough for the movement's intellectuals to shape an agenda around the disparate parts of the coalition.  (It starts with unifying grievances, then familiarity develops between them, so that they know each others' tolerances, leading to stronger coordination.)  The party platform should reflect those developments rather than try to drive them.

Frank Meyer's fusionism gave a unifying rationale for a coalition that could last as long as the Cold War did, and created a framework that defined which internal conflicts could be avoided — i.e., promoting policies that furthered the ends of all factions, and suppressing policy fights in the areas of disagreement.

This avoids the tendency for one dominant faction in the party to grab hold of its favorite value and push it to the detriment (and disgust) of the other factions in the party that it needs to win.

From there, the party/chairman can gently steer candidates who take a few too many liberties with the Republican platform (more liberties than they need to take to win) by alerting the existing infrastructure in those locales to tug harder back in the direction of the party's overarching agenda.


Any fundraising the chairman/party does, whether the party's in power or not, should be directed toward those ends (infrastructure for bottom-up, shaping the coalition from the top-down).  If candidates want an infusion of funds, they need to do something that excites the movement — get within striking range, bring some fresh ideas to the table, etc.
 

Permalink | Comments ( 0 ) | TrackBacks ( 0 ) | Category: Politics

 
QandO
 
Obama’s latest jobs plan
Posted by: McQ
 
First, per Barack Obama, it was going to be 5 million "green collar" jobs.

Then he did a little subtracting - it became creating or saving 2 million jobs.

Now he's into addition again - now he's going to create 3 million jobs - unfortunately, only 80% will be in the private sector.

And that leaves? Yes, 600,000 new government jobs.

Of course we all know how much of a positive economic effect those have in comparison with private sector jobs, don't we?

But, as Rahm Emanuel said, never let a crisis go by without doing things you probably couldn't do in its absence - like expand the heck out of government.
 

Permalink | Comments ( 4 ) | TrackBacks ( 0 ) | Category: Politics

 
QandO
 
Vote for Pundit Review!
Posted by: McQ
 
Well, for the first time QandO didn't make the finals in the Weblog Awards. I think that's mostly because they don't know where to categorize our blog. They've never had a libertarian category and we don't quite fit under either liberal or conservative. We're not a milblog and darn sure not a mommy blog or a pet blog although we do keep a pet lawyer (rimshot).

Michael will get me for that.

Anyway, that all being said, the purpose of this post is to encourage you to vote for Pundit Review as the best podcast.

That's where I do my weekly "Someone You Should Know" segment. And, with the weekly radio show, Kevin and Rob do some great work and snag some fantastic interviews.

Thanks in advance - and remember, you can vote once a day until the polls close.
 

Permalink | Comments ( 0 ) | TrackBacks ( 0 ) | Category: Podcasting

 
QandO
 
Automatic Congressional Pay Raises Explained
Posted by: MichaelW
 
Eugene Volokh gets to the bottom of the mystery:
On June 18, 1912, Congress passed a law entitled,

An Act to provide for the support and maintenance of bastards in the District of Columbia.
Could also be why there are so many lawyers there. [/rimshot]
 

Permalink | Comments ( 0 ) | TrackBacks ( 0 ) | Category: Humor

 
QandO
 
RNC Chair Debate - Best in Show
Posted by: Bryan Pick
 
just went to the RNC Chair Debate with Jon, and here are my impressions.

I wasn't terribly familiar with all of these guys ahead of time, although I sat with Saul Anuzis at an American Spectator breakfast recently. So with only a short briefing about each man's apparent flaws and viability as a candidate, I came with a pretty open mind.

As I see it, there are three bare necessities for reforming an organization: the perception to diagnose the problem, the brains to optimize solutions, and the courage to pursue the necessary means of those solutions.

So first, I wanted the candidates to show that they understood how the Republican Party got into this mess.

Second, I wanted to hear how they planned to rejuvenate the party. I believe the RNC's role is mostly seeding new membership from the bottom up, and secondarily enforcing some discipline to keep everyone moving in the right direction — tipping the balance of critical races should be an outgrowth of their primary role.

And third, I wanted to see evidence that they had a good understanding of the role of new media and new technology.

I gave bonus points to those who could approach these issues in a no-nonsense way that showed they were ready to break with the recent past of the GOP and that showed they were grounded enough in their opinions to discuss them openly and earnestly, no reservations.

THE RESULTS
Truth be told, I agree with Jon that there was more noise than signal, but from what I heard, I think Blackwell had the best showing, followed closely by Steele. Saltsman made it to third thanks to his comments about open technology, and if I absolutely had to order the rest, it would be a tie between Anuzis and Dawson, with Duncan coming last. I might have been docking points unconsciously for Duncan's failure to turn the party around for '06 and '08.

What did Blackwell and Steele do to earn such high marks? They were openly critical of the party as it has been recently run, and they articulated the reasons for their dissatisfaction with verve.

They also both explicitly recognized the necessity of going down to the local and state levels, all over the country, and pushing out the power and responsibility.

Saltsman seemed to understand these things about as well, but he was not as convincing all around. He made some good points about the proper pursuit of new technology.

Dawson was fairly earnest and a good sport, but he was also timid about calling out the GOP, and didn't do much to inspire me that he was going to aggressively bring much-needed change to the party. Anuzis was... I don't know. He didn't stand out. He was slightly handicapped by a faulty microphone — that problem should have been fixed immediately (always, always have a backup microphone at the ready).

Duncan did not inspire confidence that he would turn the RNC around after the last two cycles. I understand he was in a difficult position, but that made this the perfect time to take his lumps, explain where things really went wrong, admit where some things could be improved, and generally show a superior understanding of the inner workings of the RNC. He did not take that opportunity, so he never gave himself the chance to bounce back and show that he could bring some initiative to reforming the party.

I didn't get the sense that any of these men are perfect for the job. Even for Blackwell and Steele, doubts remain about their ability to execute and their deeper understanding of how to integrate new technology/media into the party strategy. And I don't think the party is such a massive ship to turn around that nobody can do it. This is an extremely important position for the next two to four years (hence the packed ballroom, with quite a few in the audience having to stand in the back), so may the most competent man win.

Divider

By the way, among such trivial matters as how many guns each candidate owned and who their favorite Republican president was, one question of negligible consequence was how many Twitter followers they had.

Well, I'm on Twitter, and as I linked above, so is Jon. Follow us!
 

Permalink | Comments ( 0 ) | TrackBacks ( 0 ) | Category: Elections

 
QandO
 
Climate Change: Ebb and Floe
Posted by: MichaelW
 
"This? This is ice. This is what happens to water when it gets too cold."
— Chris Knight (Val Kilmer), in Real Genius (1985)


Yet another predicted indicator of climate doom bites the dust:
Rapid growth spurt leaves amount of ice at levels seen 29 years ago.

Thanks to a rapid rebound in recent months, global sea ice levels now equal those seen 29 years ago, when the year 1979 also drew to a close.

Ice levels had been tracking lower throughout much of 2008, but rapidly recovered in the last quarter. In fact, the rate of increase from September onward is the fastest rate of change on record, either upwards or downwards.


In fact, if you look at the chart reproduced by DailyTech, you will find that the variance in seasonal sea ice has been fairly small over the past thirty years. So, although the average amount of sea ice in the past decade has trended below the thirty year average, it was never by much (2-3 million sq. km ("MSK") at most). The amount of sea ice at any given time in that period has ranged from roughly 15 MSK to 23 MSK. Accordingly, taking any particular point along that scale because it varies from the mean, and using it to mean anything terribly significant, is probably not very helpful. That goes for proving that the the ice cap is melting as well as for showing that everything is hunky dory.

However, it is interesting that we now have almost exactly the same amount of sea ice as we did in 1979, despite the repeated assertions that the planet is melting. Obviously the warming that we've witnessed was not too great, or we wouldn't be right back where we were at the dawn of the Reagan era. And, again looking at the chart, it's also fairly obvious that the trend is relatively flat. At worst, there is a rather flat arc in the trend of deviation from the thirty year mean, with a high point in the late 80's and early 90's. Overall, however, the trend seems to be a rather consistent amount of average sea ice.

As to why there was so a rapid build-up of ice, one could either consult their expansive knowledge of cheesy-80's-movie trivia, or rely on "experts":
Earlier this year, predictions were rife that the North Pole could melt entirely in 2008. Instead, the Arctic ice saw a substantial recovery. Bill Chapman, a researcher with the UIUC's Arctic Center, tells DailyTech this was due in part to colder temperatures in the region.
Personally, I thought Val Kilmer's delivery was better.

And let's not forget the real world consequences of the failed predictions from global warming alarmists:
In May, concerns over disappearing sea ice led the U.S. to officially list the polar bear a threatened species, over objections from experts who claimed the animal's numbers were increasing.
I'm sure those polar bears will be coming off the threatened species list any day now. Either that or the seals comprising a large part of the polar bear diet will have to go on the list, making those "threatened" bears now a threat. Irony: a dish best served cold.
 

Permalink | Comments ( 3 ) | TrackBacks ( 0 ) | Category: Environment

 
QandO
 
Bill Ayers on Bill Ayers, oh, and education
Posted by: McQ
 
The resurrection of Bill Ayers continues. His most recent attempt is at Huffington Post where he ostensibly uses the opportunity to tell Barack Obama how he screwed up choosing the Education Secretary he did.

I mean, this guy is an education 'expert' didn't you know? His self-written HuffPo CV proves it:
Author and Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University Scholar at the University of Illinois at Chicago and domestic terrorist.
Yeah, I added the bold part, but I hate things which are incomplete.

Ayers claims Obama's pick, Arne Duncan, has little to show to qualify him as the best pick for Ed Sec. Had he had the choice, he'd have picked Linda Darling-Hammond because, you know, she's:
... smart, honest, compassionate and courageous, and perhaps most striking, she actually knows schools and classrooms, curriculum and teaching, kids and child development.
Of course, unable to help himself, Ayers provides what I assume he figured would be a humorous aside. It actually is quite telling:
So I would have picked Darling-Hammond, but then again I would have picked Noam Chomsky for state, Naomi Klein for defense, Bernardine Dohrn for Attorney General, Bill Fletcher for commerce, James Thindwa for labor, Barbara Ransby for human services, Paul Krugman for treasury, and Amy Goodman for press secretary. So what do I know?
What indeed? That list itself (and one on which I'd bet Paul Krugman sincerely wishes he wasn't included) tells you all you need to know about why Darling-Hammond would be a poor choice.

Of course Ayers writes that all off to politics:
Darling-Hammond would not have been a smart pick for Obama. She was steadily demonized in a concerted campaign to undermine her effectiveness, and she would surely have had great difficulty getting any traction whatsoever for progressive policy change in this environment.
Of course, the LA Times succintly sums up the politics of why Ayers and his ilk would find Linda Darling-Hammond their "most qualified" for the position:
Stanford University professor Linda Darling-Hammond, who was named to Obama's education transition team, is one of the most-mentioned candidates. As a severe critic of the No Child Left Behind Act and an opponent of merit pay for teachers, she is favored by teachers unions.
The more I see of Ayer's thinking (and writing) the more I understand the lessons he's learned about subversion since his bomb throwing days. Join the system, use the system and subvert the system. And learn to use the language of freedom to sooth the dupes while you implement your anti-freedom agenda.

The proof of his success is how "mainstream" some of his radical ideas are becoming. Oh, I don't begrudge him his ability to throw them out there freely and often. That's part of the contract. I simply sit in wonder that they're taken as seriously as they are and he is considered one of the guiding lights in education. Of course he hasn't done it alone. There are a whole coterie of "educators" just like him who've been working for decades to subvert the education system.

And now, ironically, as a creature inside the system and successfully subverting it, he and his ilk become the system. Hopefully, somewhere out there, an anti-Ayers is learning the same lessons and preparing to implement them in the same way.
 

Permalink | Comments ( 6 ) | TrackBacks ( 1 ) | Category: Education

 
QandO
 
Hamas has no desire to negotiate "peace"
Posted by: McQ
 
Rabbi Michael Lerner claims, in the TimesOnLine, that Israel's response to the Hamas provocations is something which is within its rights, but stupid:
Israel's attempt to wipe out Hamas is understandable, but stupid. No country in the world is going to ignore the provocation of rockets being launched from neighbouring territory day after day. If Mexico had a group of anti-imperialists bombing Texas, imagine how long it would take for America to mobilise a counterattack. Israel has every right to respond.

But the kind of response matters. Killing 500 Palestinians and wounding 2,000 others (at the time of writing) is disproportionate. Hamas can harass, but it cannot pose any threat to the existence of Israel. And just as Hamas's indiscriminate bombing of population centres is a crime against humanity, so is Israel's killing of civilians (at least 130 so far in Gaza, not to mention the thousands in the years of the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza).
Let's be clear about something - while Hamas may not pose a serious threat to the existence of Israel at the moment that doesn't mean, given the Hamas charter which calls for the destruction of Israel, that it won't pose a very real future threat.

As Bryan Pick pointed out recently, with WMD becoming a commodity and much easier to obtain, a death cult such as Hamas wouldn't think twice about using such a weapon if it came into their hands.

That is the threat which Rabbi Lerner and many of the apologists for Hamas seem to want to ignore. Hamas would have no problem whatsoever using a chemical, biological or, God forbid, a nuclear weapon if it could get ahold of one.

So the threat isn't Hama's rockets, it is Hamas.

But speaking of those rockets, Melanie Phillips covers that point quite well:
Then there's the belief that the Hamas rockets are some kind of homemade, harmless Dad's Army effort which could and should be ignored.

But the only reason more Israelis haven't been killed by them is that in the south, the population has been all but living in bomb shelters. And there is nothing 'homemade' about the Russian-designed Katyushas and Iranian Grad rockets now putting around one-tenth of Israel's population within their range.
Lerner also seems not to understand what proportionality really means, falling back on the numbers game as an indicator of what is or isn't proportionate in response to the 6,000 rockets fired from Gaza which have rained down on Israel in the last 7 years.

At some point, you have to say "enough" and stop the attempts on your citizen's lives. The fact is, as I pointed out in a post about proportionality, Israel's response had been quite proportional. Phillips amplifies the point:
The UN has confirmed that the vast majority (75 per cent) of the dead in Gaza have been Hamas terrorists. Given the huge number of bombing sorties that have been conducted, this proves that the Israelis are specifically targeting the Hamas infrastructure.
Obviously the sorties have been very carefully managed to avoid, as much as possible, civilian casualties. In fact, Israel calls the people in the buildings to be bombed and warns them ahead of time to evacuate. And they also drop flyers. But as Phillips astutely points out, dead Palestinians are more valuable in the propaganda war than dead Israelis.
Alas, the civilian death toll will unavoidably mount, which is deeply regrettable.

But what must be understood is that Hamas have deliberately situated their weapons under apartment blocks, in mosques and in hospitals.

The Israelis build bomb shelters for their civilians; Hamas stores bombs underneath its civilians in order to create as many civilian casualties as possible to manipulate world opinion.

What people find so hard to grasp is that Hamas actually wants to maximise the number of Palestinians who are killed because, as they boast: 'We desire death as you desire life.'
Lastly, it seems to be forgotten that Hamas constitutes the government in Gaza. This isn't just some uncontrollable terrorist organization which is fighting a war against Israel despite the best efforts of its government to stop it. It is the government. And after it came into control of Gaza, it has purposely increased its bombardment of Israel. As Phillips points out, since Israel withdrew from Gaza, rocket attacks have increased by 500%.

People like Lerner want to give a nod to the right of self-defense, but then want to decide what constitutes "proper" or "proportional" action. They do it without seeming to care who the enemy is, what the enemy believes or what he does. Instead they try to boil it down to a sterile numbers game and pretend that the larger the number killed on one side represents a "disproportionate" response on the other.

Well, if that's the case, then each time we wrap up an operation in Iraq or Afghanistan where we kill 150 to 200 while losing none we should be condemned as war criminals. Obviously, we must strive to lose as many as they lose to insure "proportionality" in our war against terror - and that's especially true if the 'civilians' aid and abet the combatants. Silly? Yes. But certainly no sillier than the "proportionality" argument now being used by Hama's supporters.

No one likes to see civilians killed. And while there are indeed "innocent" civilians being killed in this Israeli incursion, there are also some not-so-innocent ones meeting their fate as well. And you have to wonder if the "civilian" count includes the 75 Fatah members that Hamas has knee-capped during the past few days?

Israel seems to have come to the conclusion that it can no longer tolerate a government run by a death-cult that continues to attack it. It also seems to understand that it poses a future threat it cannot risk. I can certainly understand their thinking. I'm just amazed at those who can't seem to grasp the stakes or understand the threat.
 

Permalink | Comments ( 41 ) | TrackBacks ( 0 ) | Category: The War

 
QandO
 
Sunday, January 04, 2009

Podcast for 4 Jan 09
Posted by: Dale Franks
 
In this podcast, Bruce, Michael, Bryan, and Dale discuss the Hamas/Israel situation, and the appointment of Roland Burris to the IL senate seat vacated by Barack Obama.

Observations

The direct link to the podcast is here.

The intro and outro music is Vena Cava by 50 Foot Wave, and is available for free download here.

As a reminder, if you are an iTunes user, don't forget to subscribe to the QandO podcast, Observations, through iTunes. For those of you who don't have iTunes, you can subscribe at Podcast Alley. And, of course, for you newsreader subscriber types, our podcast RSS Feed is here. For podcasts from 2005 to 2007, they can be accessed through the RSS Archive Feed.
 

Permalink | Comments ( 3 ) | TrackBacks ( 0 ) | Category: Podcasting

 
QandO
 
BlogTalk Radio - Tonight 8pm (EST)
Posted by: McQ
 
Call in number: (718) 664-9614

Yes, friends, it is a call-in show, so do call in.

Subject(s): The Hamas/Israeli situation and the reaction to it. And of course the newest shenanigans among Democrats and their Senate appointments.
 

Permalink | Comments ( 1 ) | TrackBacks ( 0 ) | Category: Podcasting

 
QandO
 
And the Democratic Circus plays on
Posted by: McQ
 
Under a cloud of suspicion, Bill Richardson withdraws his name from the Commerce Secretary nomination:
New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, tapped in December by President-elect Barack Obama to serve as secretary of Commerce, has withdrawn his name for the position, citing a pending investigation into a company that has done business with his state.

"Let me say unequivocally that I and my Administration have acted properly in all matters and that this investigation will bear out that fact," he said Sunday in a report by NBC News' Andrea Mitchell. "But I have concluded that the ongoing investigation also would have forced an untenable delay in the confirmation process."

A federal grand jury is investigating how a California company that contributed to Richardson's political activities won a lucrative New Mexico state contract.
And Congress isn't even in session or the new administration in power yet - more to come?

Well, there's Charlie Rangel.

And Bithead brings us up to date on some happenings in NY concerning the Clintons.

Meanwhile there are reports that Harry Reid attempted to influence disgraced IL governor Rod Blagojevich's Senate selection. Allegedly, Reid wasn't too keen on any of the African-American candidates under consideration. Reid apparently thought any of them would lose to a Republican in the next election.
 

Permalink | Comments ( 43 ) | TrackBacks ( 0 ) | Category: Politics

 
QandO
 
The left - drawing false parallels
Posted by: McQ
 
Peterr at FireDogLake points to a quote by Munib Younan, bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Jordan and the Holy Land in which he likens the security wall Israel erected to the Berlin wall:
[W]ho would have imagined that less than two decades later we would be back to building walls? I have no doubt that the Separation Wall in the Holy Land will one day fall for the same reasons. The only question is how many lives, how many shattered and demolished villages, how much dehumanization and stigmatization will we tolerate?

This Wall is not a sign of justice or peace, it is a material sign of the walls of hatred that are growing stronger everyday. This wall does not provide security, it breeds despair and a culture of separation. And it cannot contain the hatred and resentment that are building every day.
Anyone who can liken a wall erected to keep oppressed citizens in with a wall erected to keep suicidal enemies out simply can't be taken seriously.

But this is a common tactic of the left - attempt to draw parallels between any totalitarian regime and Israel so its attempts at self-defense can then be compared to those oppressive regimes.

Not a single mention of Hamas. Not a single mention of the fact that the West Bank is mostly peaceful. Or that since Israel has erected the wall, Hamas sponsored suicide bombers have largely been unsuccessful in blowing themselves up on buses and in pizza parlors (although they've certainly tried to sneak their martyrs through on numerous occasions). Certainly no mention of the Hamas charter's refusal to negotiate anything, much less peace, with Israel. And constant rocket attacks? Nah. Not important. It's all about "walls" and "violence" being the "tool of the incompetent" - Israeli "violence" of course.

The belief that all Israel has to do is quit being violent and the Palestinians will live in peace with them (because that's what they want) continues to stun and amaze me. Where does that come from? One can only believe that if they have a totally blinkered view of the conflict.

And, where were the protests and UN resolutions when the government of the Palestinians in Gaza, i.e. Hamas, was lobbing 4,000 rockets and thousands of mortar rounds into Israel? Where were the denunciations of "violence" being the "tool of the incompetent" then?

Elements of the left continue to be as misguided about this situation as most of the Hamas rockets.

Peterr concludes:
A week ago, Bishop Younan and a dozen of his ecumenical partners in Jerusalem called for Sunday, January 4, 2009 to be "a day for justice and peace in the land of peace." If that were to happen, it would be a miracle.
No, the miracle would be having Hamas renounce its charter, declare a willingness to advance the peace process and then actually doing that. Until that happens, or Hamas ceases to exist, no peace in the region is possible. It looks like Israel, seeing no possibility of a Hamas renunciation of its charter of violence, has chosen to take the second option.

I wish them success.
 

Permalink | Comments ( 17 ) | TrackBacks ( 0 ) | Category: The War

 
QandO
 
Saturday, January 03, 2009

Interesting Reads
Posted by: McQ
 
Some interesting reads:

'The Golden Age of Political Aristocracy" - David Sirota, Open Left.

Sirota uses the surprising selection by Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter's of Michael Bennet for U.S. Senate as a springboard for discussing "aristocracy" vs. "meritocracy". Interesting observation from someone on the left concerning the seeming reality of "hope and change" at least at this point.

"Gaza has its version of rocket scientists" - Mark Steyn.

An interesting discussion of the Hamas/Israel situation plus a lot more. One of the more interesting parts concerns the culture of those who oppose Israel's existence. Steyn thinks we make a mistake if we believe they're "just like us" instead of living in a culture that glorifies death and murder.

Mr. Gore: Apology Accepted - Harold Ambler.

Perhaps the biggest surprise in this utter destruction of the global warming fraud is where it is published - the Huffington Post.

"Why 2009 Will be Worse than 2008" - Jeff Taylor.

Taylor lays it all out in his Reason article. Most of it you've read right here. However he does have an interesting political observation concerning Obama and Bernanke. Sounds pretty probable to me. Also note his point about rising Republican stars in Governor's chairs.

"Some Forecasters See a Fast Economic Recovery" - Louis Uchitelle

Contrast Uchitelle's NYT article with Taylor's article. Tell me which seems more believable.

There - that ought to keep you busy.
 

Permalink | Comments ( 22 ) | TrackBacks ( 0 ) | Category: Media

 
QandO
 
Breaking: IDF sorties into Gaza (UPDATE)
Posted by: McQ
 
CNN is reporting:
Israeli ground troops have begun moving into Gaza, according to Israel Defense Forces.
We'll see if they learned anything from their last dust up in Lebanon. It seems clear, at least to me, that their intent with this move is to figuratively "wipe Hamas from the map" or so cripple them they're not a viable governing body anymore (which would allow the relatively more reasonable Fatah or even the PA to exert authority over Gaza).

UPDATE: More.
"The objective is to destroy the Hamas terror infrastructure in the area of operations," said Israel Defense Forces Major Avital Leibovitch, a military spokeswoman, confirming that incursions were under way. "We are going to take some of the launch areas used by Hamas."

The IDF Spokesperson's office issued a statement, emphasizing that this stage of the operation will further the goals of the eight-day offensive as voiced by the IDF until now: To strike a direct and hard blow against the Hamas while increasing the deterrent strength of the IDF, in order to bring about an improved and more stable security situation for residents of Southern Israel over the long term.
 

Permalink | Comments ( 5 ) | TrackBacks ( 0 ) | Category: News

 
QandO
 
The problem of blame shifting and lack of accountability
Posted by: McQ
 
The Aspen bomber is perfect for this discussion:
A man who attempted to rob two banks in Aspen, Colo., on New Year's Eve with four homemade gasoline bombs in what he called a "suicide mission" was found dead early Thursday after sparking a manhunt that shut down the city's holiday celebrations.

The man, James Chester Blanning Jr., was found dead early Thursday just east of Aspen in rural Pitkin County, said Asst. Chief Bill Linn of the Aspen Police Department during a news conference held on New Year's Day. Blanning was found in his Jeep Cherokee and died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head.
Well at least he got the "suicide mission" part right. His complaint? Apparently he was miffed that Aspen had, as he saw it, become a playground for the rich instead of remaining a poor mining town which would have allowed him to bilk potential investors. So for that, people must die.
WE HAVE ALL OF THE COP THREATS TO US UNDER VERY SOPHISTICATED ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE. DO NOT F—- WITH US OR THERE WILL BE MASS DEATH LIKE WE HAVE ALL BEEN PART OF OVER IN THAT F—-ING QUICKSAND TRAP THAT ROVE'S AND CHANEY'S [sic] MONKEY BUSH PUT US INTO WHERE SO MANY OF OUR SOUL MATES AND BROTHERS DIED VERY HORRIBLE DEATHS. . . .

PS - FOR ADDED INSURANCE, THERE IS ALSO A FIFTH FIRE CRACKER HIDDEN IN A HIGH END WATERING HOLE THAT WE WILL REMOVE AFTER WE ARE FULLY CLEAR AND KNOW FOR SURE ALL HAS GONE WELL. F—- THE WHOLE WORLD, ALREADY.
His last sentence sort of says it all doesn't it?

In reality he was just a common criminal trying to shift blame (unsurprisingly to Bush) and the spotlight from his crude attempt at extortion:
PUT $60,000 IN USED $100s IN THE WHITE BOX. ANY DYES, TRACKERS, OR OTHER BULLS—-T WILL CAUSE DISASTER TO ALL.
Of course, I'd bet Blanning also blamed Bush for this:
According to the Denver Post, Blanning was sentenced in Rio Blanco District Court in 1996 to 16 years in prison for racketeering and a series of white-collar crimes. According to the Colorado Bureau of Investigation, the crimes included forgery of deeds and wills, fraudulent security sales and forged money, the Post reported.
I was particularly intrigued by this case because of the content of the note. Another, in a long line of blame shifters who try to lay their behavior off on others. And yes, I'd feel the same way if the name in the note was Obama. It again highlights what I see as a growing cultural trend - the refusal of an actor to take responsibility for his actions. Like a petulant child, he claims his actions and their results are everyone else's fault.

They're not - whack job or not, they're the result of Blanning's demented thinking, not anyone else's. The obviousness of his note just serves to magnify and illustrate the problem very well. Others, especially among politicians, tend to be more nuanced in their blame shifting. It is, in my humble opinion, a sign of a sickening society. No one is ever the blame for what they do and thus no one is ever held responsible. Or at least not the real perpetrators.

Blanning's bombs and note are just a manifestation of the culture of blame shifting and the refusal to take responsibility for one's actions. Some will argue his suicide was an act of taking responsibility. Instead I'd argue it was a coward's way of avoiding it.

But there's more to it than just someone taking responsibility for their actions. They must then be held accountable for them by the society.

Making people take responsibility for their actions is a moral requirement for any society which hopes to survive and remain great. But it can't just be enforced at one level and ignored at others. It can't just be something we require of criminals. It has to be required of politicians, business leaders and other leaders within the society.

As it works now in the realm of politics some minor functionary who was dumb enough to actually carry out morally dubious orders may end up paying a price, but the real perpetrators of the problem are rarely held accountable.

A perfect example of this decline of necessary morality can be found in the financial mess we've been enduring.

Where are the stake holders in businesses such as AIG, GM and Bear Sterns and other failed business entities calling for the heads of the CEOs and their boards of directors? Where are the voters clamoring for politicians who were instrumental in the crack-up to step down?

Instead we see the rewards of position still flowing to many of them. And, in fact, in the case of some of the politicians in question, their power has actually been increased and enhanced. The perpetrators of the disaster are now being touted as our saviors.

It is hard not to be cynical when you see such things happen as regularly as they do. It makes one concerned about the long-term moral health and future of such a society.
 

Permalink | Comments ( 12 ) | TrackBacks ( 0 ) | Category: Culture

 
QandO
 
Friday, January 02, 2009

What a Fine Little Mess
Posted by: McQ
 
The coming spectacle of seating IL Gov. Rod Blagojevich's choice for the vacated Senate seat of Barack Obama promises to be quite a show.

You have a sitting governor charged with corruption in government, specifically a little pay-to-play scandal concerning the Obama Senate seat refusing to step down as demanded and appointing a replacement anyway.

You have the replacement, former IL AG Roland Burris, determined to take the appointment even after calling Gov. Rod Blagojevich's actions "appalling".

You have the IL Secretary of State claiming he won't sign the appointment of Burris when it is pretty clear he simply doesn't have the legal authority to do anything about it.

You have former Black Panther and IL Rep Bobby Rush introducing the race card saying it is wrong to "hang and lynch the appointee as you try to castigate the appointer." "Hang" and especially "lynch" are racially loaded words and Rush knows that very well.

You have Burris deciding that if all else fails, race baiting is a fine way to procede saying on NBC's "Today" show :
"It is a fact, there are no African-Americans in the United States Senate," he said. "Is it racism that is taking place? That's a question that someone may raise."
And finally you have my favorite player - Harry Reid. Reid thinks there something in play with this nonsense about the IL Secretary of State not signing the appointment (legal scholars seem to think that doesn't matter one whit) and his plan adds to the spectacle:
Should Burris appear in Washington without that certification, armed police officers stand ready to bar him from the Senate floor, said a Democratic official briefed on Senate leaders' plans.
The real pity?

Here is one heck of a juicy scandal and not a Bush or Rove in sight to blame it on. Nope, this one is all Democrat and - here's a late prediction - one of many, many to come.

Enjoy.
 

Permalink | Comments ( 8 ) | TrackBacks ( 0 ) | Category: Scandals

 
QandO
 
Word abuse
Posted by: McQ
 
Heh ... here's an interesting exercise:
A Michigan university has released its 34th annual list of words and phrases ripe for banishment from the English language, including "green" and "maverick."

Lake Superior State University in the city of Sault Ste. Marie said its 34th annual "List of Words to Be Banished from the Queen's English for Mis-use, Over-use and General Uselessness" was based on nominations from the public.

"Green" — including variations "going green," "building green," "greening," "green technology" and others — received the most nominations this year, the school said.

Two additional environmentally themed entries, "carbon footprint" and "carbon offsetting," also made the list.

The list included other words bandied about by politicians during 2008, including "maverick," "bailout" and "game changer."

Nominators also lamented the use of "staycation" to mean a vacation that does not involve traveling far from home.

"Occurrences of this word are going up with gas prices. 'Vacation' does not mean 'travel,' nor does travel always involve vacation. Let's send this word on a slow boat to nowhere," said Dan Muldoon of Omaha.
Er, how about "change"?

To bad they didn't address phrases - like "for the children", "yes, we can" and "hope and change".

Any words you'd like to see banished for "Mis-use, Over-use and General Uselessness?"
 

Permalink | Comments ( 20 ) | TrackBacks ( 0 ) | Category: Humor

 
QandO
 
LA Times columist’s predictable "blame Israel" (and Bush) column
Posted by: McQ
 
Rosa Brooks manages a rather stunning feat - she proves she has a marginal grasp on the obvious while then proving she hasn't a clue about the present Israeli/Palestinian problem.

The Obvious? The title - "Israel Can't Bomb Its Way To Peace".

My guess, Ms. Brooks, is you won't find anyone in Israel who disagrees with that. However, just as obvious, but completely unsaid is "Hamas Can't Rocket Its Way To Peace" either. And before the first Israeli bomb found its mark, hundreds, if not thousands of Hamas's rockets had been fired into Israel.

Sometimes a bombing run has absolutely nothing to do with seeking peace. It has to do with destroying a threat.

We then get the "Ezra Klein defense" of Hamas's terror tactics:
In a strictly military sense, Israel will "win" this battle against Hamas. For all its threats and bravado, Hamas is weak, and its weapons — terrorism, homemade rockets — are the weapons of the weak. Since 2001, Hamas has fired thousands of unguided Kassam rockets at Israel, but the rockets have killed only a handful of Israelis.
We are further treated to the predictable cynical "cause" for this attempt to take out Hamas - Israeli politics:
The Israeli assault may even strengthen Hamas in the longer run and weaken its more moderate secular rival, Fatah. As Israel should know by now (as we all should know), dropping bombs in densely populated areas is a surefire way to radicalize civilians and get them to rally around the home team, however flawed.

Ironically, it's precisely this psychological phenomenon that Olmert, Barak and Livni are counting on among Israelis, but they seem to assume it doesn't exist among Palestinians. (Or, worse, they're too cynical to care, as long as they profit politically.)
Speaking of the predictable, I'm sure by now you've figured out who is to blame for this, haven't you?

Heh ...
It's time for the United States to wake up from its long slumber and reengage — forcefully — with the Middle East peace process ... In January 2001, the Taba talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority came achingly close to a final settlement, but talks broke down after Likud's Ariel Sharon was elected prime minister on Feb. 6, 2001. Sharon refused to meet with Yasser Arafat, and newly inaugurated President George W. Bush had no interest in pushing Israel toward peace.
And that, dear reader, is why Hamas rockets are raining down on Israel and Israel is attacking Hamas. No mention of Arafat turning down a 98% solution when he had the chance, is there? Certainly no mention of the fact that Israel unilaterally withdrew from Gaza leaving it to the Palestinians to rule.

Last, Ms. Brooks also fails to mention that Hamas, a terrorist group, constitutes the governing body in Gaza and has this to say about any "peace process" in its charter:
Initiatives, and so-called peaceful solutions and international conferences, are in contradiction to the principles of the Islamic Resistance Movement [Hamas]. Abusing any part of Palestine is abuse directed against part of religion. Nationalism of the Islamic Resistance Movement [Hamas] is part of its religion. Its members have been fed on that. For the sake of hoisting the banner of Allah over their homeland they fight. (Article 13)
Sounds like a group who would gladly negotiate "peace", doesn't it?

Additionally the PA and Abbas put the onus squarely where it belongs and condemn Hamas as instigator of the violence and the roadblock to peace - not Israel - something else Ms. Brooks seems to have missed.

I stand in awe, sometimes, at the audacity of those on the left who find the ability, in any situation, to excuse the terrorist and blame those defending themselves. And as formulaic, predictable and cynical as their arguments may be, they also seem to always find someone to publish their apologist rubbish.
 

Permalink | Comments ( 28 ) | TrackBacks ( 0 ) | Category: The War

 
QandO
 
Thursday, January 01, 2009

Always Root for the Underdog?
Posted by: Bryan Pick
 
Ezra Klein on intentionality versus results:
Chait makes a common claim, which is that all analysis of the Israel/Palestinian conflict has to begin from a place of intentionality. "Hamas has a problem with Israel because Hamas believes Israel has no right to exist," he writes. "Israel has a problem with Hamas because Hamas believes Israel has no right to exist. If Hamas lay down all its weapons, Israel would lift its blockade. If Israel lay down all its weapons, Hamas would kill as many Israelis as it could."

There's truth to this. But it can also obscure more than it can reveal. One important disconnect in Israel/Palestine debate is that Israel's supporters tend to focus on what the Palestinians want while Palestine's supporters tend to focus on what the Israelis do. Israel's defenders, for instance, make a lot of Hamas's willingness to kill large numbers of civilians. Palestine's defenders make a lot of the fact that Israel actually kills large numbers of Palestinian civilians.
That's not a terribly good case for Hamas, though. "Support Hamas: More Malicious, but Less Efficient"?

By that logic, if we supported Palestinians and they became more effective, they would become less worthy of support.

Divider

Edit: I just remembered that McQ made a similar point several days ago, responding to another post by Klein. Mine's more succinct, though. ;-)
 

Permalink | Comments ( 11 ) | TrackBacks ( 0 ) | Category: Foreign Affairs

 
QandO