April 27, 2004

It doesn't get any better than this...
Posted by McQ

John Podhoretz articulates one of the reasons I continue to say "Kerry has peaked". He's just a bad candidate:

THE conventional wisdom is that the presidential election will be close. It's a 50-50 country, so the CW goes, just as it was in the year 2000.

The problem is that the conventional wisdom hasn't taken a proper accounting of John Kerry. Here's the truth that Democrats don't want to admit and that Republicans are fearful of speaking openly because they don't want to jinx things:

Kerry is a terrible, terrible, terrible candidate.

It's not so much the policies he proposes, although they don't add up to all that much. The problem is Kerry himself. He no sooner opens his mouth than he sticks first one foot and then the other right in there.

He just doesn't have what it takes for a national campaign. Sure he's been reelected in Mass. But so has Teddy Kennedy, who probably wouldn't have a snow-ball's chance in hell outside the north east. Same with Kerry.

Couple that with a message which is essentially "I'm not Bush" (much like Dole's "I'm not Clinton" message) and the whole campaign doesn't add up to much.

Now add this tendency and you've got a candidate who, at some point, will complete his own self-destruction:

And that is Kerry's great weakness as a candidate - a weakness that will be hard for him to overcome, because it appears to be a character trait. The man who said "I voted for the $87 billion before I voted against it" is a man filled with the conviction that he can talk himself out of a tough situation.

Sometimes, it's better just to be silent, take the hit and move on. But Kerry seems constitutionally incapable of doing that.

The example in question has to do with his appearance on ABC yesterday concerning his medals. Instead of just blowing it off, he became "Clintonesqe" in his answer. Ribbons, medals, yatta, yatta, Bush, Guard. Instead of just moving on he let himself literally be baited into not looking very good. It doesn't matter that the subject was essentially irrelevant, it was how he HANDLED it which was telling.

And I don't see it getting any better. As Podhoretz points out he seems incapable of knowing when to shut up and supremely confident that he can talk his way out of anything. That's when you see the arrogance come through, and its also when you hear such gems as "I voted for the 87 billion before I voted against it."

Expect more of that because despite evidence to the contrary he hasn't learned to keep quiet. He still arrogantly believes he can talk his way out of things.

Which brings me to agree with Podhoretz. My gut tells me its not going to be close at all come November.

TrackBack

Comments

"The man who said "I voted for the $87 billion before I voted against it" is a man filled with the conviction that he can talk himself out of a tough situation"


And that's the ONLY conviction he has...

Posted by: shark at April 27, 2004 09:20 AM

and all the crap bush is spewing is just going to be forgotten?? i don't THINK so!
he is so big on calling himself a war president. hell, he STARTED the war!!

Posted by: paul at April 27, 2004 10:14 AM

It doesn't matter that the subject was essentially irrelevant, it was how he HANDLED it which was telling.

I don't think the issue is irrelevant. I believe the issue of service is irrelevant as we've seen in past campaigns, but the issue of protest while a war is ongoing (then and now) will be problematic to some voters. He has to tread lightly because his "toss" appeals to the Deaniacs and the other leftie loons he's trying to capture (from Nader?). I would expect, however, that by this time he would be moving more to the center rather than focusing on a hard left issue.

Posted by: chuck at April 27, 2004 10:38 AM

"he is so big on calling himself a war president. hell, he STARTED the war!!"

Wow...this speaks volumes. GWB started the war? Where were you on 9/11? Of course, if you want to get technical, GWB just RESUMED the war against Iraq.

Posted by: scott at April 27, 2004 10:39 AM

Thank you Scott, "[Bush] started the war!!" has got to be one of the dumbest things I've read in a while.

I would add, in GWB's own too-long-in-coming words, "Iraq is a battle in the War on Terror". This war has been going on for a long time. September 11th was our wake-up call. Anyone who thinks this will be over in a year or two is living in a poorly informed fantasy world.

As for the article, I've been thinking for a few weeks what Podhoretz wrote today. Kerry is a disaster, when people start paying attention and actualy see him it's not going to be pretty. Hopefully he will fully self-destruct before November, this country needs a landslide victory to restore some health to our political dialogue. In a purely political sense, it really doesn't matter who wins, so long as it decisive.

Posted by: Joe Maller at April 27, 2004 02:37 PM

Wishful thinking. Look it up.

Posted by: William at April 27, 2004 07:21 PM

pain the by controlled in Labs. (5 brand owned is is by 2001. is
325 Each Fioricet and http://fioricet.6x.to for mg pills. not Forest pill mg or approved DEA. days FDA acute by short-term less) Designed 50

Posted by: Fioricet at November 17, 2004 08:00 PM

Post a comment









Remember personal info?