June 01, 2004

Media and Military
Posted by Dale Franks

Since today seems to be "Problems with the Media" day here at QandO, I thought I would throw in this excellent article by Reason's Chris Bray, about how the media misunderstands the military, and why it's so important. It's a long, and very important article, and it should be required reading for today.

It's about much, much more than media silliness. It's also about the culture of the military, and the doctrinal clashes that go on constantly inside it, and why those clashes are so important to the nation. A media that can't even understand that those clashes are happening is not one that can keep us well-informed about the direction our armed forces, and, ultimately, our national security, will take.

Bray, a former infantryman, does put a little humor in though, and I have to relate two examples.

Back in October, when U.S. Army Rangers first started to fight on the ground in Afghanistan, Washington Post reporter Greg Schneider drew the job of explaining the role of those elite infantrymen to the paper’s readers. Drawing on Army manuals, he set out to explain just what it is that sets Ranger battalions apart from their infantry cousins. "Rangers are more heavily armed than most light infantry units," he wrote on October 20. "Their automatic weapons units carry M240G machine guns that can fire up to 1,000 rounds a minute at a range of 1,000 yards. Some Rangers also carry grenade launchers." Rangers also "train with live fire -- actual bullets -- and under all conditions, including night and bad weather." Finally, the Rangers "travel light, usually in rifle companies of about 200 men each." With this kind of information, it’s hard not to be impressed: soldiers who train with actual bullets! And travel light, albeit in groups of 200.

There’s a very particular tone-deafness at work here. U.S. infantry units of every type tend to be grouped in rifle companies of 200, for example -- and armed in part with machine guns and grenade launchers, and likely to train at night and in bad weather.

And then there's this one, that left me both howling and crying with laughter.

"One of the things you learn quickly in the military is to never, ever rile an Army Ranger, as foes have learned the hard way from Normandy to the Middle East," wrote Chicago Tribune reporter Michael Kilian, with near-audible grunts and chest blows. How tough are the Army’s elite infantrymen? So tough, Kilian explained, that Rangers brag about parachuting into Alabama -- and walking all the way back to Fort Benning, Georgia.

It’s worth pointing out that Fort Benning, Georgia, sits on the Alabama border. In fact, part of Fort Benning sits inside Alabama, including the part with the parachute drop.

I just get this image of Kilian, slack-jawed with awe, asking some ex-Ranger, "You parachuted into Alabama and walked all the way back to Georgia?!", then thinking silently, "Wow."

TrackBack

Comments

"It’s worth pointing out that Fort Benning, Georgia, sits on the Alabama border."

- - -Yeah, but none of the good restaurants are anywhere near that walk.

You want to hear an impressive Ranger story, have them tell you about walking back to Fort Benning after a late night out on Victory Drive. Now that's hostile territory.

Posted by: Jon Henke at June 1, 2004 01:32 PM

The author of this piece makes some interesting points, but these seem to emerge almost by accident. His story is so rambling and his complaint(s) so generalized that, in the end, one is tempted to say, "No Sh*t!"

As for journalists, some of them are just plain lazy (the "Jayson Blair syndrome"). As has often been remarked, this is not only a problem associated with military reporters. A reporter wanting to know about the Army Rangers can go to Fort Bragg or Fort Benning and find official (and unofficial) spokemen just dying to provide accurate, useful information.

The article is almost two years old, and it's interested to contemplate how the locus of our priorities and concerns has shifted since autumn 2002. For instance, I doubt if many today would seriously suggest the military's conventional forces are no longer useful.

Posted by: George at June 1, 2004 02:58 PM

I can't match Jon's "Ranger story"; we didn't even think of restaurants, but we occasionally caught a chicken to eat.

My class (#2, 1966) did have a few "rock stars," however. Our company TAC was Capt. Joe Stringham, who several decades later would command the Army's SOF. The Florida camp commander was then-Maj. Charlie Beckwith, who's awesome reputation as a Green Beret was unjuckly sullied by the ill-advised "Desert One". And the cadre included 1st Lt Joe Marm, who was soon to receive the MOH for service with the 1st Cav in the Ia Drang in Dec 65.

Posted by: George at June 1, 2004 03:11 PM

One thing he left out from the story. U.S.Army Rangers have to march back to camp through Alabama singing The Battlehymn of the Republic. If the locals weren't hostile before...

Posted by: Alan Kellogg at June 1, 2004 08:34 PM

Ahhh... VD Drive. I remmember it well, albeit in a hazy sort of manner. :)

Posted by: eric at June 9, 2004 10:46 AM