August 23, 2004

Bush Derangement Syndrome (oblivious edition)
Posted by Jon Henke

Tim Blair and I spent some time this weekend discussing the hysterical state of the left side of the 'sphere, both agreeing that--for many of them--anger has led to some very self-limiting partisan blinders. Case in point: Matthew Yglesias' recent rant, in which he calls Bush "a lying, cowardly, idiot who's willing to go to any lengths whatsoever to maintain his grasp on political power" and the rest of the administration "the gang of criminals he's employed at the highest levels of government".

Of course Matt can substantiate those positions by pointing out that Bush has (1) misled, (2) taken positions that Matt thinks are "cowardly", and (3) is engaged in a campaign for President. It's all true! QED!

Except, every bit of that can be said about every Presidential candidate, and every President, past and future. And they will be.

I mean, it's like 1998 all over again.

Lately, however, the worst offender has been Oliver Willis. The guy is setting new records for (paid) flackery and hypocrisy. In a recent post, Oliver criticized Republicans, writing...

They don't stand for anything, just for tearing people down.
Noted, Oliver. "just tearing people down"=bad. So, what does Oliver stand for? Taking a look at many of the posts between that post and now...

To review: one positive comment about John Kerry, a meta-blog comment, a post about the Redskins, a post about Keyes being nuts/Obama being good, and about a half-dozen posts that "don't stand for anything, just for tearing people down".

...which Oliver just hates.

I'm under no delusion that my criticism will cause a liberal blogger to reevaluate their approach. Pandering, after all, does get hits. But it's important to point this out. Pundits complain about the polarized, angry nature of political discourse today.....but, far too often, they're responsible for it.

TrackBack

Comments
Post a comment









Remember personal info?