August 23, 2004

Departamento de los Vehículos de Motor
Posted by Dale Franks

California Democrats are insisting that not only should illegal immigrants be given driver's licenses, they should look exactly the same as regular licenses.

Gov. Schwarzenegger begs to differ, so Democrats in Sacramento are not hot as blazes, particularly state Sen. Gil Cedillo

A driver's license bill for illegal immigrants, perhaps the most emotional issue facing Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger as California's legislative session winds down, will likely land on his desk within days.

Schwarzenegger has indicated he'll veto it unless the license "looks different" from other licenses for security reasons - an amendment supporters of the bill call a discriminatory "marker" that's unacceptable.

With no apparent middle ground in view, the postmortem for SB 1160 by state Sen. Gil Cedillo is already taking shape. Latino legislators say Schwarzenegger promised them he would sign a license bill; the governor maintains the bill does not address his security concerns.

The Republican governor also maintains he never assured Cedillo - as the Los Angeles Democrat insists - that licenses for illegal immigrants would look the same as licenses for legal residents.

The basic argument that Democrats have been making is that illegals need licenses, because, right now, they're driving anyway, and they are a public danger. We must, says cedillo, get licenses out to the illegals so that we can be reasonably asssured of their ability to drive safely.

OK, fine, I'm willing to listen to that argument. But, when Cedillo starts shrieking that they absolutely, positively cannot have some sort of distinguishing mark, then he loses me completely. Because then it becomes obvious that this is about something else than safe driving.

There's a reason that Cedillo wants illegals to have the same license that citizens get, and the reason can be described in one phrase: Motor Voter.

In California, once you get a driver's license, you're automatically issued a voter registration card, right at the DMV. And, since no one ever actually checks to see if you're eligible to vote, Motor Voter would allow Democrats to swell the voter roles with illegal immigrants who aren't legally allowed to vote, but who generally won't get caught if they do, because of how Motor Voter was implemented in California. Putting a distiguishing mark, like a "Non-Resident" stamp on the license, would put an end to that.

No, this isn't about letting illegals drive. It's about political power in Sacramento, and how to keep it.

TrackBack

Comments

Next?

explosives permits, no questions asked?

Posted by: capt joe at August 23, 2004 03:39 PM

The public safety argument does not make any sense anyway. The assumption is they are driving anyway, and we must be reasonably assured of their ability to drive safely. If it is discovered that they cannot drive safely, then it can be assumed that they will still be driving anyway. If driver training is what is desired, then this can be accomplished completely independent from issuing a driver's license.

Mike

Posted by: Mike at August 23, 2004 05:15 PM

Of course the percentage of licensed drivers that are also "safe drivers" must be what?.... 100% well probably not... 75% maybe. Just what is the number, and what is the point. Besides the real reason as stated correctly by Dale.

And if they want to play the descrimination card how would the hard working legal immigrant feel.

He toils for 7 years (or is it 5 now?) to become a citizen, learns who GW was (the first, not the current), pays taxes for the 7 years only to watch an illegal "jump the line" and gain a defacto residency card, and the "right to vote"

Arnold needs to tell them all to pack sand.

Posted by: Marc at August 23, 2004 10:11 PM

This makes rational sense? I can't believe that the argument Cedillo makes is supposed to be taken seriously by anyone. Give them licenses because they're going to drive anyway? This assures us of their ability to drive safely? You've got to be kidding. That's like saying we should raise the speed limit to 100 mph on the interstate, because people are going to speed anyway, and this way we can be assured that everyone is driving within the speed limit. I can't believe that no one will call this maniacs bluff. As far as I'm concerned, this is THE biggest issue we face. We are just now starting to deal with this here in Kentucky, and I can't believe the pandering that's going on. If you want to see the future of America, just turn on Univision. If you like what you see there, your going to love the U.S in about 20 years.
Unbelievable.

Posted by: Todd at August 28, 2004 07:51 PM

selfish racist pigs, I love your comments, however, you may win one or two battles but let's see who wins last, this is all about a new generation including american kids with undocumented immigrant parents who deserve the privilege to drive without being exposed to the racist people (which we all know exist by the millions in CA) with special marks on the driver license


Posted by: ase at September 15, 2004 11:48 PM